Equities

FICO Stock Analysis 2026: 28% Critical Upside, Debt Risk

FICO stock analysis: secure data center server hall with cool blue lighting, endless rows of racks receding in…
Know a sophisticated investor who needs to see this?

Current viewThis is our latest analysis of Fair Isaac Corporation, published October 2026. It supersedes our earlier assessment of February 2026, which remain published in full for the record.

↓ Download the full research PDF · free, no email required

Published: October 2, 2026

FICO Stock Analysis 2026: 28% Critical Upside, Debt Risk

Key takeaways

  • FICO stock analysis at $661.75: Fair Isaac trades at 15.6x forward non-GAAP earnings, with latest reported revenue growth near 24% and EBITDA margin near 53%.
  • WP Score: 64/100, below the 65 BUY threshold; the score reflects leverage and negative tangible equity, not franchise quality.
  • Base-case model fair value near $850 implies approximately 28% upside, with a modeled bear-case downside near $386, a 42% decline.
  • Largest risk: VantageScore entry into conforming mortgages plus tri-merge to bi-merge could cut mortgage score volume and compress growth.
  • Verdict: HOLD as an analytical conclusion for risk-aware investors; the model does not size positions or advise purchases.

Executive summary

FICO stock analysis at $661.75 shows a tollbooth franchise with 85% gross margins trading at 15.6x forward earnings, a steep discount to its five-year average, and a model-estimated fair value near $850, implying roughly 28% upside under base-case assumptions. The modeled bear case falls to near $386, and the WP Score is 64/100 due to $5.6 billion of debt and negative tangible equity. This note is an analytical model, not investment advice; the HOLD conclusion reflects the balance-sheet risk.


Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.


Check your inbox!

Get the next report first

This analysis is free to download below, no email required. Subscribe and the next report reaches you the day it publishes.






The Tollbooth Mechanism: Why FICO Stock Analysis Starts With Pricing Power

FICO owns a genuine pricing-power asset in U.S. financial infrastructure. Lenders, insurers, and government-sponsored enterprises use the FICO Score as the default risk language for consumer credit. This FICO stock analysis starts from that tollbooth position: FICO collects a fee each time a market participant uses the score, without taking credit risk itself.

The latest management disclosures in the research packet show the Scores segment produced $458.9 million of revenue in the most recent fiscal quarter, up 41% year over year. B2B scoring revenue rose 49%. Mortgage origination scores, unit pricing, and origination volume drove the increase. This is the core of any FICO stock analysis: the revenue stream depends on how often lenders pull scores, not on whether the loans perform.

The Software Transition: Platform ARR vs. Legacy Revenue

The Software segment remains smaller and less impressive on reported revenue. Software revenue rose only 2% to $215.3 million in the latest quarter. Platform software annual recurring revenue grew 62%, but non-platform ARR declined 17%. Total Software dollar-based net retention reached 109%, down from 136% platform-level retention in the prior quarter. Management is converting legacy license revenue to cloud ARR, which suppresses reported growth while the recurring base improves.

The margin structure explains the quality. For the latest twelve-month period presented in the research packet, gross margin reached 85.1%, EBITDA margin 53.0%, operating margin 52.1%, and net margin 34.1%. Gross margin climbed from 74.7% in fiscal 2021 to 85.1% in the latest period. Operating margin expanded from 31.4% to 52.1%. A company that converts half of every revenue dollar into operating income while growing revenue about 24% has a product customers cannot easily replace.

The moat has three layers. Regulatory and institutional lock-in: Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and most securitization documents reference the FICO Score. Switching costs: lenders, credit bureaus, and risk models have trained on FICO behavior for decades. Scale in data: alternative score providers must prove equivalent predictive performance before lenders absorb counterparty risk.

Management raised fiscal 2026 revenue guidance to $2.53 billion, GAAP net income guidance to $850 million, and non-GAAP EPS guidance to $42.43, as detailed in the FICO investor relations release. These are forward-looking management targets, not reported results. The research packet’s latest reported twelve-month revenue was $2,394 million, up 24.1%, with EBITDA of $1,268 million, up 39.5%. The current price of $661.75 and management’s $42.43 EPS guidance imply a forward P/E near 15.6x.

The FHFA Lender Choice model weakened the first moat layer but did not eliminate it. VantageScore 4.0 can now compete for conforming mortgages, yet lenders still choose the score that investors and mortgage insurers accept. FICO responded with a direct license program offering FICO Score 10T alongside the Classic FICO Score at no extra fee. More than 70 mortgage lenders now use FICO Score 10T, covering over $313 billion in annualized mortgage originations across FHFA-regulated markets.

FICO stock analysis: secure data center server hall with cool blue lighting, endless rows of racks receding in…

Financial Fortress: How Debt Shapes Fair Isaac Risk-Adjusted Returns

The balance sheet is the weakest part of this FICO stock analysis. Total cash stood at $248.44 million and total debt at $5.6 billion in the latest reported period, producing net debt near $5.35 billion. Against LTM EBITDA of $1.268 billion, that is 4.2x net debt to EBITDA. StockAnalysis reports Debt/EBITDA at 4.39x and Debt/FCF at 5.62x. Stockholders’ equity is negative because years of share repurchases have exceeded retained capital.

AlphaQuery reports debt-to-equity of -1.75 and ROE of -37.34% for fiscal 2025. Simply Wall St rates financial health at 1 out of 6 and warns that debt is not well covered by operating cash flow. These are not normal signs for a preservation-grade balance sheet. The income statement covers the debt without current strain.

Interest coverage of 6.69x means LTM operating income of $1.247 billion covers interest expense 6.7 times, above the 5.0x minimum and below the 8.0x preferred threshold. Cash covers under 5% of total debt, below the 20% preferred level. Free cash flow is real. Fiscal 2025 FCF was $739.4 million, a 37.1% FCF margin on $1,991 million of revenue. The latest reported quarter showed FCF of $370.3 million, up from $276.2 million a year earlier.

Stress Testing a 30% Revenue Decline

A 30% revenue decline stress test matters more than current ratios. If fiscal 2027 revenue fell 30% from the $2.53 billion guidance, revenue would land near $1.77 billion. At gross margin of 78% to 80%, gross profit would sit near $1.4 billion. Operating expenses have run near $790 million against $2.04 billion of LTM gross profit, so operating income might compress to $500 million to $600 million. Interest expense on $5.6 billion of debt at 3% to 5% would run $170 million to $280 million.

FICO would remain solvent and could continue servicing debt because it pays no dividend. Buybacks would stop, and the company would likely retain cash rather than draw incremental debt. The debt maturity schedule appears in the SEC filings; the cliff risk remains a monitoring item.

The solvency assessment is ADEQUATE, not FORTRESS and not MARGINAL. Negative tangible equity prevents a FORTRESS designation. Stable, high-margin FCF prevents MARGINAL. A fortress would be debt-free or net cash with stronger short-term liquidity. FICO relies on earnings power rather than balance-sheet liquidity to absorb a downturn. That works until the competitive threat arrives in the same year as a mortgage downturn.

FICO stock analysis: modern low-rise glass office campus at twilight in Bozeman, Montana, snow-dusted Bridger Mountains…

FICO Stock Analysis Valuation: 15.6x Forward Earnings vs. Five-Year History

The model uses 20.0 million diluted shares outstanding for forward valuation, consistent with management’s fiscal 2026 net income guidance of $850 million and non-GAAP EPS guidance of $42.43. At $661.75, that gives a $13.24 billion market capitalization. Adding $5.35 billion net debt gives an $18.59 billion enterprise value. The latest reported twelve-month financials are revenue $2,394 million, EBITDA $1,268 million, operating income $1,247 million, and net income $815 million.

The latest reported diluted EPS was $34.81, which implies an average diluted count near 23.4 million shares during that period. The lower forward count of 20.0 million reflects the announced buyback programs, and this FICO stock analysis uses it only for forward per-share estimates to avoid mixing old and new share counts. This reconciliation removes the apparent arithmetic conflict between the prior $14.29 billion market cap, the $42.43 EPS guidance, and LTM EPS.

FICO stock analysis: close-up of mortgage broker's wooden desk with stacks of blank paper loan forms, fountain pen…

Current multiples sit far below FICO’s own five-year history. The five-year average forward non-GAAP P/E is 43.7x, according to the research packet’s historical data. The current forward non-GAAP P/E, using management’s $42.43 guidance, is 15.6x. The five-year average EV/EBITDA is 40.7x; the current EV/EBITDA on LTM EBITDA is 14.7x. The five-year average P/S is 16.6x; current P/S is 5.5x. Trefis historical P/E was 89.2x in fiscal 2024 and 61.0x in fiscal 2025; a forward estimate dated September 15, 2026 points to 27.9x, but that is an estimate, not a reported figure.

The gap between P/S and earnings multiples reflects FICO’s margin. Against the IT sector median, FICO trades at a premium on P/S at 5.5x versus 3.58x, but that premium reflects 85% gross margin and 53% EBITDA margin. Sector median EV/EBITDA is 18.36x and FICO is 14.7x, a discount. Sector median forward non-GAAP P/E is 22.18x and FICO is 15.6x, also a discount. The market pays more per dollar of sales for FICO than the average technology company but less per dollar of profit. For a high-margin asset, the profit multiple is the relevant yardstick.

Two Routes to a Model Fair Value Near $850

A base model fair value near $850 comes from two routes. Applying a 20.0x multiple to management’s $42.43 non-GAAP EPS yields $848.60. The second route applies 17.5x EV/EBITDA to projected fiscal 2026 EBITDA near $1.30 billion, producing an enterprise value of $22.75 billion. Subtracting $5.35 billion net debt leaves $17.40 billion of equity, or $870 per share on 20.0 million shares. Both routes land in the $850 to $870 model range, approximately 28% above the current price under base-case assumptions.

The valuation is not excessive. The low price already assumes some competitive loss and slower Software growth. It does not assume the full bear combination: VantageScore share gains plus a mortgage recession plus a debt-service squeeze. That combination is lower probability, but it is exactly the scenario preservation analysis must quantify before upgrading from HOLD to BUY. This Fair Isaac valuation maps to our Wealth Preservation scoring system.

Scenario Analysis: Probability-Weighted FICO Stock Analysis Returns

The bear case starts from management’s fiscal 2026 non-GAAP EPS guidance of $42.43 and cuts it 30% to $29.70 in fiscal 2027. That assumes the tri-merge to bi-merge change reduces Score volume per mortgage application, VantageScore takes share at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and mortgage originations weaken. Revenue would fall in both segments, with Scores revenue down more than 20% at the trough. Interest expense remains a fixed claim of $170 million to $280 million.

A 13x multiple on trough EPS of $29.70 would place the stock near $386, a 42% decline from the current price. From the reduced EPS base, a 4% recovery over nine years produces 2036 EPS near $42 and a price near $676 at a 16x terminal multiple. The ten-year CAGR from $661.75 is 0.2%. That is a positive nominal return but below inflation and below the 4% savings yield. The near-term drawdown risk is why this FICO stock analysis holds the WP Score below 65.

The base case assumes FICO retains pricing power, the direct license program stabilizes mortgage volumes, and platform ARR replaces legacy Software revenue within three years. Revenue grows near 12% annually, operating margin holds near 50%, and non-GAAP EPS grows 9% annually for ten years. From $42.43 in fiscal 2026, EPS reaches $100.40 in 2036. A 20x terminal multiple gives a $2,008 price target and an 11.7% CAGR. No dividend contributes. The base case return clears the 7% hurdle and exceeds the 4% savings alternative by almost 8 percentage points per year.

The bull case requires two things to go right at once. First, FICO Score 10T adoption accelerates beyond $313 billion in annualized originations and the direct license program converts price objections into sustained volume share. Second, the Software platform shift completes, with non-platform ARR decline bottoming and total Software revenue growing above 10% by fiscal 2028. In the bull case, EPS grows 13% annually for ten years to $144, and the terminal multiple expands to 22x. The 2036 price target is $3,169 and the CAGR is 16.9%.

Weighting bear at 25%, base at 50%, and bull at 25% gives a model probability-weighted return of 10.2% CAGR. These weights are illustrative planning assumptions, not observed frequencies. The distribution skews positive, but the bear-case near-term path remains too painful for a full preservation position in this FICO stock analysis.

Scenario Model Weight 2036 Price Target Total CAGR Contribution
Bear 25% $676 0.2% 0.1%
Base 50% $2,008 11.7% 5.9%
Bull 25% $3,169 16.9% 4.2%
Model expected 10.2%
FICO stock analysis: close-up of customer's hand tapping an unbranded credit card on a plain payment terminal at a…

Risk Assessment: VantageScore, Bi-Merge, and Litigation Overhang

The largest business risk is VantageScore’s formal entry into conforming mortgages. The FHFA Lender Choice model lets Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac accept VantageScore 4.0. Freddie Mac began accepting it on April 23, 2026, with Fannie Mae following, according to the research packet. That cracks open FICO’s highest-margin territory. The shift does not yet appear in the latest reported numbers: the second quarter of fiscal 2026 showed revenue up 39% and B2B Scores revenue up 72%. The market repriced the stock anyway. If VantageScore converts from availability to lender adoption at scale, Score volume and pricing would contract even without a recession.

The tri-merge to bi-merge transition is the most concrete structural volume risk. A move from three credit scores to two per mortgage application could cut FICO score volume by up to one-third in that channel. That change would reduce revenue growth before the direct license program can offset it with higher unit pricing or broader Score 10T adoption.

The antitrust litigation represents a tail risk. The court dismissed all claims with prejudice except the Sherman Act Section 2 claim and companion state law claims against FICO. Discovery is proceeding, and FICO says it will defend vigorously. A loss or a consent decree that caps mortgage score prices would damage both revenue and the market’s willingness to assign a tollbooth multiple.

Regulatory and data risks remain. FICO’s forward-looking language cites regulatory changes applicable to the use or costs of consumer credit and other data. Data-privacy rules, including GDPR and evolving U.S. state laws, could limit the data sources on which Scores depends. Cybersecurity risk appears in every filing, with the added warning that cloud migration expands the attack surface. A breach involving sensitive consumer credit data would produce both financial and reputational loss.

The Balance Sheet as a Risk Multiplier

The balance sheet multiplies every other risk. Net debt of $5.35 billion and negative tangible equity leave little room for a sustained earnings decline. Interest coverage of 6.7x would fall below 4x in a 30% revenue decline scenario. The company has no dividend cushion, so a preservation investor receives no cash during a drawdown. The Software segment adds execution risk: reported Software revenue grew only 2% in the latest quarter, while non-platform ARR declined 17%. If the platform transition stalls, the segment will subtract from consolidated growth.

The model assumes an approximate 8% probability of a sustained loss above 50% from the current price. This figure is an illustrative scenario assumption, not a statistical estimate from observed defaults. A permanent loss of that size would require either a catastrophic litigation outcome or the combination of VantageScore adoption, bi-merge volume loss, and a mortgage downturn. The model does not treat that as the base expectation.

Market Expectations and Analyst Consensus

At $661.75, the market prices FICO as a fading growth asset. At 15.6x forward non-GAAP earnings, the market assigns a lower multiple than the IT sector median of 22.18x and less than half of FICO’s five-year average. If the market required a 10% annual return and FICO earned $42.43 per share in fiscal 2026 with no dividend, the current price would reflect flat long-run EPS growth under a 16x exit multiple. That is difficult to reconcile with management guidance of 22% non-GAAP EPS growth and sell-side next-12-month revenue growth estimates of 19.2%. Either the market expects the VantageScore threat to destroy that growth quickly, or the market is mispricing the resilience of the Scores segment.

Analyst ratings are positive but not unanimous. The research packet’s consensus snapshot, undated, reports 11 Buy, 5 Hold, and 0 Sell with a mean target of $1,553.69 from MarketBeat. TIKR data showed 11 Buy, 5 Outperform, 4 Hold, and 1 Sell, with a mean target of $1,535. The Street high is $2,400. Those targets were set at higher market prices and have been falling, so this FICO stock analysis does not treat them as independent forecasts.

The most concrete bear event is already visible. The latest reported quarter missed consensus revenue estimates by 1.5%, $674.2 million versus $684.7 million, even though adjusted EPS beat by 3.4%. PEG is reported at 0.72, and at the current forward P/E of 15.6x against 22.5% expected EPS growth, the forward PEG is near 0.69. A PEG below 1 signals the market does not believe the growth rate will persist. The next quarterly report is scheduled for November 4, 2026, according to the research packet; that date is forward-looking and subject to change.

For informational purposes only, you can view the Moschovakis Capital equity portfolio on eToro. Angelos Moschovakis is a verified eToro Popular Investor; copy trading is not personalized investment advice and involves significant risk of loss. eToro is a multi-asset platform, and your capital is at risk.

Peer Comparison: FICO Against Data and Ratings Tollbooths

The peer table uses sector medians and qualitative tollbooth analogues because peer-specific company data is not in the research packet. FICO still trades at a premium to the IT sector on sales because its 85% gross margin and 53% EBITDA margin convert a lot of sales into profit. On profit, cash flow, and EBITDA, FICO trades below both the sector median and its own five-year average.

FICO’s current forward non-GAAP P/E of 15.6x compares with a 22.18x sector median. EV/EBITDA of 14.7x compares with 18.36x. Price-to-cash flow near 13x compares with 18.57x. These discounts are real. The five-year average forward non-GAAP P/E of 43.7x was inflated by the 2024 peak, but the stable 2022-2025 average still sits far above today’s level.

Qualitative tollbooth comparables include S&P Global, Moody’s, MSCI, CME Group, Visa, and Mastercard. Those companies share FICO’s pricing power and regulatory embed but carry lower balance-sheet leverage and more diversified revenue. FICO’s current EV/EBITDA of 14.7x is low for that group, but its net debt and negative tangible equity distinguish it from the safest tollbooths. Our published S&P Global equity analysis, MSCI research note, and Morningstar equity analysis quantify the same tollbooth economics without the leverage burden.

For a preservation peer, FICO ranks below Moody’s and MSCI on balance sheet safety but above most cyclical software names on durability. The premium on P/S relative to the IT sector is not a reason to avoid the stock. The discount on profit multiples is the signal relevant to this FICO stock analysis. You accept leverage risk in exchange for a model-estimated margin of safety that the ratings tollbooths do not offer today.

Moschovakis Capital — Quantitative Division

Automated FX Execution: A Separate Return Stream

While this FICO analysis requires patience over a 3 to 5 year horizon, our Quantitative Execution System operates on a different time horizon. The system is fully automated and runs 24/7. Past performance and any track record are not indicators of future results. The program involves significant risk of loss and may not be suitable for all investors. Performance disclosures and methodology are available at the link. This is not a solicitation to invest.

Explore the Quantitative System →

Conclusion: The HOLD Verdict for FICO Stock Analysis

FICO operates a genuine tollbooth with 85% gross margins, about 24% revenue growth, and a forward P/E of 15.6x, down from a 43.7x five-year average. The franchise quality is not the problem. The pricing power is not the problem. The problem is the fortress: $5.6 billion of debt, negative tangible equity, zero dividend, and a rising VantageScore threat that could compress the highest-margin mortgage scoring volume.

The model probability-weighted return of 10.2% CAGR clears the hurdle, and the model-estimated margin of safety near 28% provides asymmetric upside under base-case assumptions. The 64/100 WP Score and the modeled 42% near-term bear-case drawdown keep the conclusion at HOLD. This FICO stock analysis would support a more favorable conclusion only after visible deleveraging and VantageScore containment, subject to each investor’s suitability and risk tolerance.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is FICO stock analysis signaling a buy or hold in 2026?

This FICO stock analysis concludes HOLD at $661.75, not a BUY. The base-case model implies an 11.7% annualized return with about 28% model upside, but the 64/100 WP Score sits below the 65 BUY threshold because of leverage and negative tangible equity. The conclusion is analytical, not a personalized recommendation.

Is Fair Isaac overvalued at $661.75?

At 15.6x forward non-GAAP earnings, FICO trades below the IT sector median of 22.18x and below half its 43.7x five-year average. On profit multiples the stock is discounted, while on price-to-sales it still carries a premium because of 85% gross margins. The valuation is not excessive, but the leverage keeps it from qualifying as a full preservation BUY in this model.

What is Fair Isaac Corporation’s dividend yield?

Fair Isaac pays no cash dividend, so the dividend yield is 0.0%. Capital returns flow through share repurchases, including a $2 billion authorization announced June 8, 2026 and a $1.5 billion accelerated repurchase with Wells Fargo, as disclosed in the research packet.

What is the biggest risk in this FICO stock analysis?

The biggest risk is VantageScore gaining conforming mortgage share under the FHFA Lender Choice model, combined with the tri-merge to bi-merge change cutting score volume by up to one-third per mortgage application. That scenario would compress Scores revenue growth and amplify the leverage burden.

Is FICO stock suitable for investors seeking downside protection?

This FICO stock analysis ranks downside protection below safer tollbooth peers because of $5.6 billion of debt and negative tangible equity. A modeled bear case shows a 42% drawdown to near $386. Investors with low tolerance for balance-sheet leverage should evaluate that scenario before any decision. This is an analytical observation, not a buy or sell instruction.

For the full FICO stock analysis methodology and the complete Moschovakis Capital research framework, explore the equities library at moschovakiscapital.com/equities/ and review the Wealth Preservation scoring system. This note is a research model, not investment advice.

Execution Infrastructure

For the execution of positions discussed in our research, we utilize the following institutional-grade platforms due to their regulatory compliance, liquidity, and reliability.

Platform Purpose
eToro Equity execution — regulated, social trading infrastructure
Revolut Multi-currency banking and FX
Interactive Brokers Institutional-grade brokerage
Vantage MT4/MT5 execution
Binance Digital asset infrastructure
Hostinger Web infrastructure

Risk Disclaimer: Past performance is not indicative of future results. Moschovakis Capital is a technology provider and research publisher, not a licensed financial advisor. Trading and investing in financial instruments involves significant risk of loss. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose. The analysis presented is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalized investment advice.

eToro Disclaimer: eToro is a multi-asset platform. The value of your investments may go up or down. Your capital is at risk. Copy trading does not amount to investment advice. The value of your investments may go up or down. Your capital is at risk. eToro USA LLC does not offer CFDs. Do not invest unless you are prepared to lose all the money you invest.

Affiliate Disclosure: Some links on this page are referral links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This does not influence our analysis or recommendations.

Fair Isaac Corporation: the full research PDF

The complete report behind this analysis — DCF model, valuation tables and scoring detail. No email, no form.

Download the PDFPDF · 66.6 KB

Frequently asked questions

Answers below are quoted directly from this analysis, as published on 2 October 2026.

What is the Wealth Preservation Score for FICO?
WP Score: 64/100, below the 65 BUY threshold; the score reflects leverage and negative tangible equity, not franchise quality.
Is FICO a buy in 2026?
Verdict: HOLD as an analytical conclusion for risk-aware investors; the model does not size positions or advise purchases.
What is the fair value estimate for FICO?
Base-case model fair value near $850 implies approximately 28% upside, with a modeled bear-case downside near $386, a 42% decline.
Does FICO offer a margin of safety?
The model probability-weighted return of 10.2% CAGR clears the hurdle, and the model-estimated margin of safety near 28% provides asymmetric upside under base-case assumptions.

Research and opinion, not investment advice. Figures are as at the publication date above and are not maintained in real time.

Related Research


Know a sophisticated investor who needs to see this?
Copy Portfolio on eToro

Don't have an eToro account yet? Open one here.